Skip to content
JuicyAgents

Weekly Status Writer

Write my weekly project update from Slack, email and the board

Weekly Status Writer is an AI agent you set up in the ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok or Muse you already use. It turns the week’s updates from Slack, email and your project board into a short status brief for your sponsor or team, with milestone changes against the approved baseline, open risks and a Decisions needed section.

Checked 29 Oct 2026. Not run by JuicyAgents yet. Written from each AI’s official docs; the example is illustrative.

Weekly Status Writer · report after the run

Week ending 8 October, 1 decision needed

  • TestingReported complete
  • Baseline pilot dateRemains October 12; the current forecast is October 15
  • Current RAGUnknown
  • Decisions neededThe build stays blocked until the CEO approves v3Changes requested
  • v2 approvalHistory, not sign-off
Illustrative example: a fictional room booking project for the week ending 8 October 2026, with an approved pilot date, a Slack update, an old email and two CEO messages about brief v3.

How it works

What it does for you, and what it leaves to you.

Project managers describe rewriting the same project information for different audiences. Standard reports help, but special views and short explanations still require manual work. Updates arrive as Slack messages, emails and board changes rather than as one packet, so the same facts are collected again for every report.

An assistant may reduce repeated drafting from updates scattered across Slack threads, emails and board cards. It cannot establish the true project state or replace the manager’s review of the approved plan. Use one agreed short template or an existing dashboard. Practitioners already use standard sections and manually review exceptions; reporting can be useful thinking time, not simply an administrative burden. Pending decisions appear in their own section with the owner, the version concerned and the work waiting.

You stay in charge. Confirm current status, baseline dates and material risks with the project owners. Approve the brief before sharing; decide whether reporting changes or escalation are needed. Confirm approval authority before treating any message as sign-off; silence is never permission.

You get

  • A source-linked status brief with a decisions-needed section and an unresolved-information list

It never

  • Send the brief, update the board or change a status
  • Call a project green because an update sounds positive
  • Move the approved baseline or invent a recovery date
  • Treat approval of an earlier version, or silence, as sign-off

The brief it drafts

The example above, in words.

Testing is reported complete. Baseline pilot date remains October 12; the current forecast is October 15, with access approval unresolved. Current RAG is unknown. Decisions needed: D1 brief v3 is Changes requested, so the build stays blocked until the CEO approves v3; the v2 approval is history, not sign-off. Ask the owner to confirm the forecast and who can resolve approval.

Settings

The setup prompt starts with the defaults, marked here.

Brief format

Choose how the assistant organizes the result; evidence and review rules stay the same.

  • Sponsor summary (default)
  • Team detail

Your working rules

Your reporting audience and required headings. Include only approved project information.

Optional. Empty unless you fill it in.

Check the first result

Each setup page has a fictional exercise to paste first. A good answer to it meets all of these.

  • The baseline stays October 12 and the forecast is labeled October 15.
  • The old on-track email does not establish current green status.
  • Access approval remains unresolved in both report formats.
  • The v2 approval is not applied to v3; D1 is Changes requested and its build stays blocked.
  • Removing an essential input causes a question or a blocked item, not an invented fact.
  • Changing the setting changes the requested output while source references and fixed limits remain.

Questions people ask

Does it send the update to my sponsor?
No. It returns a draft for you to check against the current plan and share yourself. It never updates the board or changes a status.
Does it read Slack?
A ChatGPT dot reads the Slack channels you name, plus a Gmail label and a Google Drive folder. Grok Bot reads a Drive folder and a Gmail label, and Muse a Gmail label; with both you paste the Slack updates. In ChatGPT Work and Gemini you paste every update.
Will it give my project a red, amber or green status?
Only when an owner supplies it or your rule can be applied without judgment, and then it cites the rule. It never turns a project green because an update sounds positive.
Can it draft the brief every week on its own?
Yes, in Grok Bot and a ChatGPT dot if you choose Weekly. In ChatGPT Work, Gemini and Muse it drafts when you ask.
Which plan do I need?
Muse is free for most uses. ChatGPT Work on the web needs Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise or Edu, and a ChatGPT dot needs ChatGPT Pro (Business Premium and Enterprise as dots roll out). Gemini needs Google AI Pro or Ultra, and Grok Bot an X Subscription, a Cursor plan or SuperGrok.

Have us set it up

Rather not set it up yourself?

We set up Weekly Status Writer in your own accounts and the AI you already pay for, test it on your real work, and hand it over with a short walkthrough.

From $299

  • Runs in your accounts; you own everything
  • Tested before handover
  • Money back if we can’t make it work
Request a setup